All posts tagged government
All posts tagged government
The University of Arizona is creating a new National Institute for Civil Discourse. Undercover Nun finds it profoundly sad that her beloved nation needs such a center, and I hope that it will be effective in demonstrating how people who disagree with each other, who hold passionate positions, and who work in our government can work together for the good of our people without descending into the cesspit of rhetoric that passes for political discourse today.
The National Institute for Civil Discourse - a nonpartisan center for debate, research, education and policy about civility in public discourse - will open Monday in Tucson. It was created in the aftermath of the Jan. 8 shootings in the city where six people were killed and 13 injured, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.). …
One of the institute’s first events will be a conference with members of the media, foundations, academic institutions, government and corporations to discuss advancing the national conversation about civil discourse, said Meredith Hay, provost of the University of Arizona.
Although the Tucson shootings were not linked to public discourse, she said, they “created a space for us to think about civil discourse.”
I am still appalled at our Congress members’ complete lack of response to the Civility Pledge. And I hope that we won’t give up on the discussion of civil discourse. All lawmakers who identify as Christians should recognize that maintaining civility in public discourse is very basic to the love Jesus commands us to give to all persons. This same love is revealed throughout the Hebrew scriptures as well, so Jewish lawmakers have no excuse, either. Civility is a bare minimum, and yet our elected leaders cannot promise this to each other or to us.
Undercover Nun prays each day for our government, by name for those elected to represent her. I will pray also for the work of this new Institute.
That’s right, a Senator in Belgium is urging spouses and significant others of all politicians to refuse sex until the deadlock in forming a government is broken.
In the US, we don’t have to worry about this, because we have a two-party system, so automatically there is a majority party. But in nations with true multi-party systems, there may not be a party that has a majority of votes. If the votes break down as 5%-27%-33%-35%, then two of those parties are going to have to get together to form a government somehow. Until this gets worked out, the work of governing goes undone.
In Belgium, they’re at a 242 days of deadlock, just a week shy of the record 249 days set by Iraq. That’s more than 8 months with no chief executive, no way to pass legislation, presumably no budget. I’m sure it’s not a happy place to be right now. Happier than Egypt, perhaps, but that’s owing to the lack of violence.
Undercover Nun prays for the people of Belgium, and for peace among its recently-elected politicians.
Also? The last paragraph of the story is the best.
Catherine Fonck, a Christian democrat senator, rejected the call. “I don’t want to take part in a sex strike,” she said. “Politicians are not there to strike. On the contrary, politicians are there to arouse the country.”
Pun intended, I’m sure. (And pray for me, a sinner.)
I think that people want peace so much that one of these days government had better get out of their way and let them have it.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (via postmodernista)
Eisenhower is my hero.
(via vruz)
Alabama’s next governor gave a speech yesterday afternoon about his vision for leadership in the next few years. He started off well, but then he decided to present a horrible caricature of Christianity:
“There may be some people here today who do not have living within them the Holy Spirit,” Bentley said. ”But if you have been adopted in God’s family like I have, and like you have if you’re a Christian and if you’re saved, and the Holy Spirit lives within you just like the Holy Spirit lives within me, then you know what that makes? It makes you and me brothers. And it makes you and me brother and sister.”
Bentley added, ”Now I will have to say that, if we don’t have the same daddy, we’re not brothers and sisters. So anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brother and you’re not my sister, and I want to be your brother.”
Undercover Nun has this to say to Mr. Bentley: BULLSHIT.
Yeah, you heard that right. We are all children of God, whether we want to be or not. While we may try to deny that we are created by God, but that won’t stop the Holy Spirit from breathing life into us or prevent God from loving us more than we can imagine. And just as you couldn’t choose the brother or sister or cousin in your family, we don’t get to choose who else is in God’s family with us. We are all brothers and sisters in God’s family.
The saving act of Jesus causes all of humanity to be adopted into God’s family. It’s clear from the prophets, the gospels, and the New Testament epistles that Jesus came for all people, all nations. Through Jesus, Israel becomes a light to all nations, to the entire world. Through Jesus, everybody becomes a recipient of God’s grace, and absolutely nobody is left out.
Yes, God yearns for us to choose to live in relationship with God. Yes, Jesus longs for us to see him as brother, as companion, as savior. But not even our hard-headed choices can separate us from God’s love and grace. Not even our stiff necks and stubbornness can prevent Jesus from choosing us. To believe this is to circumscribe God and to limit God’s power. Well, Mr. Bentley, not even you can do this.
Asked later if he meant to be insulting to people of other faiths, Bentley replied, ”We’re not trying to insult anybody.”
Bentley’s communications director, Rebekah Caldwell Mason, when asked about Bentley’s comments said, ”He is the governor of all the people, Christians, non-Christians alike.”
I’m glad that Mr. Bentley wasn’t trying to insult anybody. He did insult people, though. When you say these are my family, and those are not, you are insulting those. When you limit God’s ability to adopt who God pleases, you are insulting God. When you insult God, you insult those who believe in and follow God. So by making this asinine statement, Mr. Bentley insulted absolutely everyone in Alabama, not to mention the Almighty. Way to go, dude!
People of Alabama, Undercover Nun is praying for you. I truly hope that Mr. Bentley will be the kind of governor he wants to be, that he will truly represent and care for everyone in the state, regardless of color, class, or faith.
And Mr. Bentley, I’m praying for you as well. It will not be your place as governor to judge anyone based on his or her professed faith. This is God’s job. You are Caesar, responsible for protecting and caring for the physical, social, and environmental needs of the people of your state. My prayer is that you will remember to render unto God what is God’s, and that you will take care of the flock that will be entrusted to you, appropriately and with integrity.
Let me first say that I’m answering this question for myself. I believe that the things I write here are, for the most part, fairly common among progressives, but I’m sure that there will be individual exceptions.
As a progressive, I understand that the world does not remain static. We live in a complex and dynamic world, where change is constant.
As a progressive, I believe that our responses to a dynamic world must not remain static. The best answer yesterday may not be the best answer for today. We may need last week’s answer, the answer from 150 years ago, or a completely new answer.
As a progressive, I believe that “This is how we’ve always done it” is not sufficient reason for our response to a dynamic world. This isn’t automatically the wrong response, but it isn’t automatically the right response, either.
As a progressive, I believe that progressives need conservatives. Truly, we need those who are more reluctant to change their responses to the world because they hold us accountable for persuading them that a different response is the better response.
Similarly, I believe that conservatives need progressives. It is so very easy to fall into the “This is how we’ve always done it” trap, to become comfortable and complacent while Rome burns around us. Progressives help conservatives see other options that may — or may not — be better.
As a progressive, I believe that all persons have value. No human being should be diminished or harmed intentionally by another. I know that this is impractical, because we aren’t perfect, but this is an ideal that we try to live up to.
As a progressive, I believe that all persons are deserving of dignity and respect. No person deserves vilification, manipulation, or abuse. All persons deserve consideration, compassion, and kindness.
As a progressive, I understand that “all persons” includes those who live at the margins: those who live in poverty, who have no home, who lack meaningful employment, who are ill or disabled, who were born in a nation that lacks for basic resources, who look different from the majority, who follow a different faith than the majority.
As a progressive, I also understand that “all persons” include those with whom I disagree. This means that no person with whom I disagree deserves to be mocked, vilified, harmed, abused, or diminished as a person. Those with whom I disagree deserve respect, dignity, consideration, compassion, and kindness.
As a progressive, I believe that religion is important. The ideas that underlie our faith lives shape us deeply as persons, whether we identify ourselves with Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, or any other faith tradition.
As a progressive, I believe that rights are important. There are fundamental rights that we share as part of our personhood, such as the famous life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I believe that one of the most important roles of government is to protect and promote human rights, understanding that this is not always simple or easy in a complex and dynamic world.
As a progressive, I believe that human rights include the right to continue living, the right to choose a faith tradition and to practice it, the right to have sufficient nutrition, the right to have sufficient shelter and protection from the elements, the right to meaningful employment, the right to basic care for body and mind, the right to freedom and integrity of mind and heart, and others that I may not have enumerated here.
As a progressive, I believe that life is a precious gift. War should only ever be a last resort, never the first. Violence is wrong, whether it is physical or not, whether it is perpetrated by an individual or by a government.
As a progressive, I also understand that decisions involving the balancing of one life against another are necessarily complex and may not have a “correct” answer. This includes questions of self-defense (both individually and corporately), medical care for the terminally ill, saving the dangerously suicidal, medical abortion, capital punishment, and many others. I do not know if there are any universal solutions to any of these questions, but I know that each one must be undertaken with proper care and discipline.
As a progressive, I understand that not all responses to our dynamic world are simple. There are many simple (not necessarily easy) guidelines for us, like the bold-faced statements I make here. In practice, though, the ways in which we live these out are usually quite complex. Balancing the rights of all citizens, for example, is a complex proposition, and it does require some sacrificing of individual rights for the good of all.
As a progressive, I recognize that government is sometimes the most effective agent. Yes, I agree that individuals and communities should support those who live at the margins, providing food for the hungry, shelter for the homeless, and protection for human rights. However, we humans often become caught up in our own struggles, and we can forget such important responsibilities. Thus, it is not inappropriate for us to empower our government to take on some of this work, recognizing the government’s unique economies of scale and of scope.
As a progressive, I believe that civility and respect in political discourse should be highly valued, and that we must hold our leaders accountable for this.
As a progressive, I love my country, while recognizing that it doesn’t have all the right answers. It is possible — and probably necessary — to recognize the flaws in my country without diminishing love or loyalty to my homeland. No person, faith group, political party, or other community has an exclusive hold on patriotism.
As a progressive, I understand that diversity is a gift that enriches any community. Great value lies in cherishing the unique perspective and gift that each person brings to the community. The disabled man sees the world differently than the female athlete, who sees the world differently than the retired military officer, who sees the world differently than the foreign students at the local university.
As a progressive, I also believe that we must celebrate the things we all share in common. We may be diverse in ethnic heritage, faith tradition, education, career, physical and mental ability, and any other quality; at the same time, there are many aspects of human life — especially life together in a community or a nation — that we hold in common.
Of course, there are many other things that I know, believe, and/or value. Not all of them define me as a progressive, but I believe that these do.
Last night, I encountered a person on twitter who is a very angry liberal. He believes that conservatives are evil, demonic, and non-persons. He believes that they should be attacked fought without any pretense to fairness, that they have abandoned their personhood and their basic rights to respect and dignity. I disagree, and overnight I found myself reflecting on what it means to be a progressive, and why I was bothered so much by his vilification and abuse.
I believe that progressives have a responsibility to model progressive values, even when this may come at the cost of winning elections. It is our inherent duty to rise above petty unfairness and bickering, to eschew unethical or immoral tactics, to refrain from diminishing the personhood of our opponents.
Progressives need to demonstrate that there is a better answer, a better way to live together and to “do” government. Yes, governing a nation will necessitate conflict, disagreement, and compromise. No, this does not mean that disrespect, indignity, manipulation, vilification, abuse, or any other diminishment is desirable or necessary.
Progressives understand that we’re all in this together. So let’s try to get along, so that we can work for the very best for our community, okay?
The situation in Iraq is extremely bad. It’s very bad. The services that the Iraqi public are receiving are dysfunctional. People don’t have access to very basic services like water, electricity, sewage, education and healthcare. The political situation is deteriorating. It’s very bad. Iraq does not have a government almost after six months of the election. And the security situation is extremely bad, as well. But these are two different tracks, though. From an Iraqi perspective, although a majority of Iraqis, maybe a national consensus, would agree that the situation is extremely bad in Iraq, that Iraq is still broken, there is still a majority of Iraqis who want this occupation to end. So it’s not like Iraqis believe that prolonging the occupation would fix what this occupation has broken.
Raed Jarrar (via azspot)
And the psalmist cries out, “How long, O Lord, how long?”
Undercover Nun weeps and prays, prays and weeps. So much is wrong, that I don’t even know where to begin to help bring something to rightness.
It was the federal government and the Supreme Court that struck down the repressive laws that made blacks second class citizens. It was federal troops that protected marchers and school children. Although this is a new century, with new issues, blacks still think of the federal government as their savior, their protector. Whereas whites see the current administration’s grab for power as an encroachment on personal liberties, blacks look at it from a totally different perspective. For us it is a further leveling of the playing field with the backing of the full faith and credit of the federal government.
Agnes Cross-White (via azspot)
I hadn’t ever thought in these terms before. Having just watched Forrest Gump the other day, and remembering George Wallace’s speech when the university was forcibly desegregated, “the administration’s grab for power as an encroachment on personal liberties” is precisely how white people saw desegregation.
What folks fail to realize is that some individual freedoms are limited in order to protect the liberty of ALL.
Lord, have mercy on all of us: white, black, or any other color.